Despite the applause of the public in the absence of the award of the choreographic award comforts us on the clarity of rules, intentions and procedures (carried out with extreme consistency, transparency and full respect of all stakeholders)For the benefit of those who did not understand what was said on stage, we find it useful to reiterate the following, for the highest consideration of each:

1. Our Call provides that the choreographic section will evaluate and reward the characteristics of the composition, as such. This is done through 3 evaluation steps.

2. This premise has been adhered to by the judges (the jury is, however, as is well known, differently composed for each stage of the award, to ensure maximum objectivity in the judgment, in a process and progressive).

3. As stated expressly on stage, at the awards ceremony, the fact that, as regards the parameters specified by the regulation, the quorum for victory was not reached, nothing detracts from the performative quality (which is different from the compositional quality), which was intended to be recognized, calling the groups to perform, regardless of having the choreographer passed the final stage, which he was accepted.

4. Access to the Gala shall in no way and under no circumstances be deemed binding with respect to the award of the category prize

5. In the transparency and consistency of the evaluations, it was considered clear (and subsequently made explicit on stage, to guarantee the widest consideration of each) that:
– it is one thing to reward the composition of the choreographer,
– Another thing is to recognize the effectiveness of the performers (the result of the excellent work of a teacher and his students), despite the creations themselves had not been considered by the judges adequate for the podium (which includes the choreographic aspect)with reference to the Call for Proposals.